Dear Editor:
Re “Payment Offers to Egg Donors Prompt Scrutiny” (May 11): After postwar physicians routinely placed pregnant women at risk for miscarriage on diethylstilbestrol, it took decades before the deadly effects of that synthetic hormone were uncovered.
Without long-term follow up, it is simply not possible to offer potential egg donors a truly informed consent about the long-term risks of taking the powerful synthetic hormones associated with the egg retrieval process. Yet, there is no effort now under way to establish a registry to find out what the long-term risks are. Why is that?
Consider what happened to magazine editor Liz Tilberis, comedian-actor Gilda Radner, playwright Wendy Wasserstein and many other women who underwent hyperstimulation and died of cancer in the prime of their lives. Shouldn’t we first attempt to provide a full informed consent before financially encouraging women to take powerful hormones?
Diane Beeson
Tina Stevens
San Francisco
More reading on egg donation with some interesting firsthand comments here:
1 comment:
It's heart breaking. I've noticed the same thing but somehow didn't make the connection.
It saddens me that couples who are just trying to have a baby together are put in scenarios where they face the ultimate loss.
This is a woman's issue. If the medical community cared more about women's lives this would not be such a "hidden risk".
Post a Comment